Essense of Taqleed ,What is it? Is it Blind Following, Taqleed is only in those cases where more than one ruling from Hadith is Possible Legal status of Taqleed

No Muslim can deny that Islam's real message is to obey Allah alone. Emphasis has been placed upon following the Prophet Muhammed sallalahu alaihi wa sallam because he represented Allah's commandments through his words and actions. Allah and His Messenger have to be unequivocally followed in what is halal (permissible) and what is haram (forbidden): what is allowed and what is not.
Whoever believes in following anyone besides Allah and His Messenger and regards that person as independent (of Allah and His Messenger) is surely outside the fold of Islam. Thus, every Muslim should attempt to follow the commandments of the Qur'an and Sunnah (the traditions and norms of the Prophet sallalahu alaihi wa sallam).

There are certain commandments in the Qur'an and Sunnah which a lay person can understand. Such commandments are not intricate, ambiguous or contradictory. Understanding these commandments and their implications can be effortlessly achieved without confusion.
For instance, Allah says: "Do not back bite" (Surah Al-Hujuraat: 12)
Anyone familiar with the Arabic language will immediately understand the verse, since there is no ambiguity in the statement, and nor does it clash with any other Islamic value it is readily understood.
 Likewise, the Prophet sallalahu alaihi wa sallam said: "There is no preference of an Arab over a non-Arab"
This Hadith is also clear and uncomplicated. A rudimentary knowledge of Arabic would enable its understanding.
Conversely, there are many commandments in the Qura'n and Sunnah which are ambiguous. In fact, there are some statements which seem to contradict other verses of the Qura'n or a Hadith. For Example, the
Quran says: "And those women who are divorced should wait for three 'Quruu'." (Surah Al-Baqarah:228)
 The verse has stipulated that the waiting period for a divorced woman, in order to remarry, is three 'Quruu'. The word Quruu in the Arabic language is used to denote both the monthly menstruation period (Haydh) and the time in between the monthly period (Tuhr).
If the former meaning were taken, then the rule would be that a divorced woman should wait for three monthly menstruation periods (Haydh) to elapse.
If the later meaning is taken, the rule would be that the divorced woman should wait until three months in between her monthly menstruation period (Tuhr) have expired.
 The question is which one of these two meanings applies. Similarly a Hadith of the Prophet sallalahu alaihi wa sallam says: "Whoever does not stop the practice of Mukhabarah should hear the proclamation of war (against him) for Allah and His messenger."
 Mukhabrah is a specific kind of farming in which a landlord makes an agreement and a farmer, who is hired by him, to cultivate his land.
The agreement stipulates the amount of produce, which is to be divided by each party. There were several forms of Mukhabarah practiced during the time of the Prophet sallalahu alaihi wa sallam. This particular Hadith is brief and vague as to which particular kind of Mukhabarah is forbidden. 
The Prophet sallalahu alaihi wa sallam said in another Hadith: "Whoever has an Imam, then the Imam's recitation is his recitation."1
This seems to indicate while the Imam is reciting in salaat, the follower should remain silent.
However, another Hadith says: "There is no salaat for he who does not recite Surah Al-Fatiha." 2
This seems to indicate that everyone should recite Surah Fatiha. The question arises whether the first Hadith should be taken as the primary source referring to the Imam or the one who offers salaat individually and the second Hadith explained as a corroborating evidence; or should we make the second Hadith the base and that the first Hadith refers to the Imam's recitation after he recites Surah Fatiha.
 Needless to say from the above examples, the process of extrapolating rules from the Qura'n and Sunnah can be complicated.

One solution is that we exercise our understanding and insight in such issues in order to make our judgments and rulings.
Another solution could be that instead of making independent rulings ourselves, we look into what the predecessors ruled concerning these issues.
After investigating the opinions of the scholars whom we know to be more qualified and more adept in these issues than ourselves, we rely on their understanding and insight and act according to their rulings.
If we consider with fairness, from the two options (mentioned above), the former option (of exercising our own understanding) is fraught with difficulties, which will be examined later.

The second option (of relying on the opinion of a scholar from the past) is much more cautious. This is so not merely because it seems like a humble approach but because it is an undeniable reality that we have very little resemblance with the scholars of the first Muslim era.
We fall short of their knowledge, understanding, intelligence, memory, morals and piety.
In addition, the scholars of the first era were close to the environment and time when the Qura'n was revealed which allowed understanding the Qura'n and Sunnah in its entirety. We, on the contrary, are so distant from the time when the Qura'n was revealed that we are not disposed to a comprehensive understanding of the Qur'an's background, to its environment, the social norms of that time and to the language of that era.
The factors listed above are indispensable if anyone is to understand the Qura'n and Sunnah.
After considering all of these points, if we do not rely upon our own understanding but instead follow the opinion of a scholar of the past in matters which are ambiguous or complicated, then it will be said that we are following, or making Taqleed of that scholar. This is the essence of Taqleed. 
Taqleed of an Imam or a Mujtahid is only valid in areas where understanding a rule of the Qura'n and Sunnah is difficult or complicated, 
regardless of whether this is because an additional meaning may be drawn from the text or
there is some intricacies in the text, or 
even if there seems to be a certain contradiction in the text. 
An absolute and conclusive text where there exists no ambiguity, brevity or apparent contradiction in the text of Quran or Sunnah, there is no Taqleed of any Imam or Mujtahid. 

The famous Hanafi jurist, Shaykh Abdul Ghani Al-Nablusi states: 

The issues which are agreed upon - without any doubt and by necessity - do not require any Taqleed of any of the four Imams like the obligation of Salaat. Fasting, Zakaat and Hajj, etc. and like the prohibition of adultery and fornication, drinking wine, murder, stealing and usurping. The issues which are debated are the issues where Taqleed becomes necessary."

 3 Shaykh Khatib Al-Baghdadi writes: "As far as the Islamic rules are concerned, there are of two types. The first are those which are known by necessity to be part of the Deen of the Prophet sallalahu alaihi wa sallam like the five prayers, Zakaat, fasting in Ramadhan, Hajj; the prohibition of adultery, wine and so on. Taqleed is not allowed in these issues since they are such that everyone should know and understand. The second type are those rules which need to be understood and extrapolated such as the details of the rituals of worship, transactions and weddings, for example, Taqleed is allowed in these issues since Allah says: "So ask the people of remembrance if you know not." (Surah Al-Nahl: 43) If Taqleed was not allowed in these issues it would mean that everyone would have to learn these particulars (directly). This would cut off people from their work and livelihood; ruin crops and destroy cattle. Thus, this requirement [of learning these details] should be dropped." 4 3 
Taken from the book The Legal Status of Following a Madhab By Shaykh Mufti Taqi Usmani (Ret. Chief Justice Shariah Applet, Supreme Court of Pakistan) without any change of word. Book is on

No comments:

Post a Comment